Next

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

The Company had no interest rate derivative instruments outstanding at February 3, 2001, and January 29, 2000.

In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133). The statement, which was amended in June 2000 by SFAS No. 138, “Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities,” is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2001. SFAS 133 requires all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. If the derivative is a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in Other Comprehensive Income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value will be recognized immediately in earnings. Based on the Company’s derivative positions at February 3, 2001, the Company does not believe that adoption of SFAS 133 will have a significant effect on earnings or the financial position of the Company.

[10] FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at February 3, 2001, and January 29, 2000, are (in thousands):

The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was based upon the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for financing arrangements with similar terms and maturities.

Carrying amounts reported on the balance sheet for cash, cash equivalents and receivables approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.

[11] CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to significant concentration of credit risk, consisted primarily of cash, cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable.

The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents and certain other financial instruments with various financial institutions. The financial institutions are located throughout the world, and the Company’s policy is designed to limit exposure to any one institution or geographic region. The Company’s periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions are considered in the Company’s investment strategy.

The Company’s footwear wholesaling businesses sell primarily to department stores, mass merchandisers, and independent retailers across the United States and Canada. Receivables arising from these sales are not collateralized, however, a portion is covered by documentary letters of credit. Credit risk is affected by conditions or occurrences within the economy and the retail industry. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information.

[12] COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is involved in environmental remediation and ongoing compliance activities at several sites. The Company is remediating a residential area adjacent to owned property in Colorado, under the over-sight of Colorado authorities. This residential area has been affected by types of solvents previously used at the facility. The Company is also remediating the owned property. In fiscal 2000, a class-action lawsuit was filed against the Company related to this site. The Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of this lawsuit will have a materially adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition. During fiscal 2000 and 1999, the Company incurred charges of $3.0 million and $1.8 million, respectively, related to this site.

The Company has completed its remediation efforts at its closed New York tannery and two associated landfills. In 1995, state environmental authorities reclassified the status of these sites as being properly closed and requiring only continued maintenance and monitoring over the next 23 years. In addition, various federal and state authorities have identified the Company as a potentially responsible party for remediation at certain landfills from the sale or disposal of solvents and other by-products from the closed tannery and shoe manufacturing facilities.

 
Next